git rebase basics - Stack Overflow
2013年12月26日 · I assume git rebase --pull is much like git pull --rebase. It does a fetch and then a git rebase @{u} Well, that's a lie, but it is an easy way to think about it. But the point is that your local branch is reset to @{u} and then all local commits on your old branch before the reset are replayed on top of what upstream has.
When do you use Git rebase instead of Git merge?
2009年4月29日 · Basically, use git pull --rebase instead of git pull:) What's missing in the article though, is that you can enable it by default: git config --global pull.rebase true git rerere. Again, nicely explained here. But put simply, if you enable it, you won't have to resolve the same conflict multiple times anymore.
How do I use 'git rebase -i' to rebase all changes in a branch?
2008年12月13日 · git rebase -i @{upstream} Note that if your upstream (probably a tracking branch) has updated since you last rebased, you will pull in new commits from the upstream. If you don't want to pull in new commits, use. git rebase -i `git merge-base --all HEAD @{upstream}` but that is a bit of a mouthful.
Why would I want to do git rebase? - Stack Overflow
2012年11月5日 · For this reason, git pull --rebase is a better option for small changes resulting from short development, while a merge is reserved for integration of long-lived feature branches. All this applies to rebasing local commits, or rebasing a short-lived feature branch shared by closely connected coworkers (sitting in the same room).
What's the difference between 'git merge' and 'git rebase'?
2013年5月21日 · Reading the official Git manual it states that “rebase reapplies commits on top of another base branch”, whereas “merge joins two or more development histories together”. In other words, the key difference between merge and rebase is that while merge preserves history as it happened, rebase rewrites it.
git - Completely cancel a rebase - Stack Overflow
Before Git 2.27 (Q2 2020), The stash entry created by "git merge --autostash" to keep the initial dirty state were discarded by mistake upon "git rebase --quit", which has been corrected. See commit 9b2df3e (28 Apr 2020) by Denton Liu ( Denton-L ) .
Move the most recent commit (s) to a new branch with Git
2009年10月27日 · In my opinion this is a defect in git rebase. It has nothing to do with my answer above, though. There are many circumstances in which git rebase with no arguments can cause trouble. The moral of the story (unfortunately) is not to call git rebase without passing in a branch, even if that branch is already the upstream. Git's usability has ...
Git: How to rebase to a specific commit? - Stack Overflow
The git rebase --onto B_hash A_hash D_hash answer is definetly a correct one, but in this case you also get a detached head. In your case it's better to do it by explicitly naming a branch. Assuming the name is topic: git rebase --onto B_hash A_hash topic You could also create a branch on a start (B), e.g. name it b-branch and end up with:
git - How to rebase local branch onto remote master - Stack …
@Jono git fetch && git rebase origin/master are two separate commands; where git fetch retrieves latest changes from master without merging and git rebase origin/master is to perform the actual rebase on top of latest master. Where as git pull --rebase origin master is combination of both these commands. I would suggest to use separate commands ...
git rebase - Choose Git merge strategy for specific files ("ours ...
2013年5月30日 · Even though this question is answered, providing an example as to what "theirs" and "ours" means in the case of git rebase vs merge. See this link. Git Rebase theirs is actually the current branch in the case of rebase. So the below set of commands are actually accepting your current branch changes over the remote branch. # see current branch ...